Archive for November, 2009

« Older Entries

Col. Lewis Millet

Posted in Military on November 25, 2009 by SweetEnlow

I wanted to present  a story about Col. Lewis Millet who died recently at the age of 88.  This is one of the more interesting katz I have heard about in the last four years at the Institution.  The inspiration foor the post came about from his recent obituary listed in the NYT last week.  This man caused such a stir that I have spoken about him at length in two different classes.

Millet is a descendant of soldiers who fought in the Revolutionary War, Civil War, and WWI.  Millet was so eager to fight that he went AWOL before Pearl Harbor, joined the Canadian Army, and attempted to gain action there.  Nevertheless, he came back to the US Army and presumed to win a Silver Star in the invasion of North Africa.  He was then soon court martialed, then promoted to Lieutenant – this kind of stuff does not happen.

He won the Medal of Honor, the greatest award an American can receive, in the Korean War by conducting what is called the last great bayonet charge in American history.  He stormed a gunnery position and bayoneted three different enemy while sustaining injuries.  His quotes about the raid  in the Times article are priceless.  He casually stated how he “got one (enemy) in the throat,” and the other “in the forehead” which he described as sticking a watermelon because at that time “he was strong as a bull.”

I really find him interesting because of his approach to his vicious combat experiences.  Millet and the current talk of PTSD, which I would never argue exist, presents a very interesting case study of someone who, after experiencing horrific combat, shows no apparent sign of difficulty interacting within society.  I have also noticed this with many Special Forces officers who have no doubt taken many lives.  With one SF officer particularly, if you did not know his background, you would think he was a bleeding liberal from UC-Berkeley.  It is interesting how some are more capable of coping than others.  The origins of some soldier’s difficulty with PTSD is an interesting, yet very pressing question.  The answer would be highly beneficial for the future of combat soldiers.

This man is an American hero and he is a man who was put on this earth to soldier.  He was likely at times very cantankerous and definitely ol’ school, but interesting nonetheless.

here is a link to his Obituary in the NYT and a picture

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/us/19millett.html 

a bad dude fo sho

“I went from Army deserter to colonel,” he said. “I served in two armies, in three wars — in Africa, Europe and Asia.” He said he had met presidents, “had my picture taken with some of them. But I was honored to fight for freedom, and I’d do it again.”

p.s. In 1991, when he was 71, he called the Army to see if he could fight against Saddam… guy could just not get enough!

4 Comments »

Food Inc.

Posted in Health, Movies on November 25, 2009 by SweetEnlow

I watched a great documentary last night entitled “Food Inc.”   It was similar in its approach to the Wal-Mart documentary I recently commented on in that it attempts to smash the large corporations running our food distribution (it subtlety points of some issues with Wal-Mart as well).  The basic premise is that the way humans attain their food has changed more drastically over the last fifty years than the prior ten thousand years.  And the reason for this drastic change is due mostly to the massive rise in fast food companies.  Their rise has caused only a few corporations to have an oligopoly over the food market.  This has caused there to be some serious problems.

It started out as another liberal (but entirely necessary in my opinion) documentary about the horrors of major corporations seeking nothing but bottom-line profit.  Understandable complaint, but they do produce massive amounts of quality as a very cheap rate which no can complain about.

The bigger issue I really have is of course with the quality of the product.  Cows are mistreated, not only ethically (my opinion), but also medically.  Because the majority of beef is corn-feed now instead the way they were evolved to eat with grass, E.Coli, along with other diseases, is rampant.  The companies try to remedy this not by discovering and fixing the underlying cause, but temporarily treating the problem.  This has caused the rise of treating meat with disinfecting chemicals like chlorine and ammonium.  This isn’t a shocker, but ingesting chemicals everytime you eat is not good for health.  In addition, considering I love animals (but I also love to eat them), I did have issues with the treatment of the animals as well, but I that is really beside the point.

 In my opinion, the most fascinating thing covered in the movie is the issue of Corn and its effect on the entirety of food and its distribution in the US.  One needs to watch it to gather the full insight, but it is incredible.  Corn as a product is extremely powerful (it is literally in almost every product one consumes), but also a serious detriment to our health it seems.

The movie attempts to persuade people to take a conscious approach to discover what they are eating.  Honorable no doubt.  However, what the movie really does a good job  of (whether on purpose or not)  is to show the power of the free market.  Consistently throughout the movie, they directors revert to interviews with a couple good-ol-boys who are entirely organic in their approach to animal farming.  Their beef is grass-fed and their treatment of the animals is entirely appropriate.  But what is important is that these producers are killing it in the market (I have read that their profit ratios are incredible, but they are on such a small-scale that their revenue doesn’t compare to companies like Tyson.  But one should assume this).  They are killing it because the market is starting to determine that shitty, unhealthy products is no longer going to be the norm in America’s food choices.  There is a massive underground movement taking place throughout America whereby people are desiring organic, properly grown/raised products.  Even Wal-Mart is attempting to provide organic products.  Hopefully sooner than later, because of the high price of organic fruit, vegetables, and especially meat, consumer demand will increase so much that supply will answer. This should, depending on the shifts in supply and demand, drive the price down making it somewhat more affordable.  Right now, the supply is just to small.

Just remember that paying for higher prices of quality food in the present is much cheaper than paying for massive health care bills later in life that are sure to accrue by a poor diet. 

The movie is great and everyone who takes an interest in their health should watch it.  It is an easy, stimulating hour and a half.

2 Comments »

Gotta love that older girl

Posted in Lifestyle on November 25, 2009 by SweetEnlow

Modern society advancements has caused the way in which we live to be drastically different then the way evolution had intended.  The heavy grain-based diet killing its citizens through obesity, diabetes, and heart disease is only but one example of the disconnect between our current and appropriate lifestyle. However, the characteristics of the modern-day society has not been all bad.  Technology and Innovation have improved the quality so much so that it is almost unimaginable.  Who would have thought ten years ago that entire businesses are running off of a mobile phone!

These are all points that have been made by others much smarter than myself and frankly, their constant acknowledgment has caused me to lose some interest.  Thus, this post is going to talk about another aspect of the modern society that benefits men in a way never before.  This aspect is the capability, as well as the more open acceptance, of a younger man dating an older woman.

Sure, for thousands of years, older men have been involved with the younger female.  From an evolutionary standpoint, this is entirely logical.  Younger females tend to be healthier and more fertile.  From a social standpoint, older guys tend to have a better capability of capturing a younger girls love/interest for a variety of reasons – admiration, greater amounts of self-confidence, social status etc… - think about all your days of yore in high school.  However, only until recently, men have never really been capable of dating older women.  Again, from an evolutionary standpoint, this makes sense, but times are changing.  The Demi Moores/Ashton Kutchers of the world are redefining the concept of relationship standards.

So, to get at my earlier point, it is a great thing I feel for a younger man to date an older woman.  First, it usually tends to be a very stress-free relationship.  Both members in the relationship acknowledge the situation and simply leave it at that.  Because of this, the couple will likely tends to simply enjoy themselves and “the moment” and forgets the “important” characteristics of the future – committment, economics, life choices.  But the most important idea is that an older woman can give a younger man invaluable relationship lessons that would likely not be learned by him dating another female of the same age, and almost certainly not of him dating a younger woman.  The maturity level usually is just not there.  Older women have simply  been around the block (socially speaking) and know what matters and what doesnt (also a contributing factor to the relatively stress-free relationship).  As long as the older woman isn’t nuts, the life lessons taught to the younger man are likely invaluable.

In terms of age, I think it applies to all age discrepancies.  However,  if it happens for the male in his early 20s, I feel he is likely going to gain the most insight.  A 30-year-old man dating a 40-year-old woman does not have as much to learn as a 22-year-old.  An early twenties gentleman is probably dating a woman in her upper twenties or slightly older who has a much different outlook on life.  If she is capable, realizing there likely is no future, she can set that man up for unparalleled relationship success with his future wife.

Ladies, I would interested to hear what you had to say on this one.

4 Comments »

Guest Blog – Ayn Rand and the modern economy by Ben Bettin

Posted in Guest Blogz, Lifestyle on November 25, 2009 by SweetEnlow

The following is a note about the recent surge in interest in the philosophy of Ayn Rand, her works, and their meaning for contemporary politics in America. To be noted is how much the events of the last 2-3 years bear a striking resemblance to events in the radical novel Atlas Shrugged.

The below links are responses in popular media to the resurgence of Rand’s philosophy.

http://www.slate.com/id/2233966/

http://www.gq.com/entertainment/books/200911/ayn-rand-dick-books-fountainhead?currentPage=1

To begin, Existentialism and Objectivism are not necessarily incongruent and Rand’s aversion to religion has more to do with her constant insistence that Man is his own being, and not dependant on other “mystical foundations” (her words, not mine). For Rand, her economic philosophy IS her moral philosophy…and vice versa. This is, I think, where both her more ardent supporters and virulent detractors run into problems. Her moral philosophy is founded on the nature of man being defined as a heroic being…and that all who fail in recognizing and celebrating this fact through productive contributions to society (or passionate sexual exploits based loosely on a notion of equitable values and partially on a sugar-coating of basic animal instincts…) are simply the “looters.” Back this out into the economic realm and it becomes clear that the only system that allows for pure recognition of someone’s value and worth in society is one that is free of all forms of interference in our ability to signal to each other what we want and care for – free market, libertarian, capitalism. 

What bothers me about both articles was this: the United States is (unfortunately) very, very far away from that ideal form of capitalism that Rand wants and longs for…and yet the authors of these two pieces were able to pounce on the success of these people (Wall Street traders, Hedge Fund managers, Small Business entrepreneurs) and throw them under the bus saying “see! These people are Randians. They screwed us with their capitalist greed and selfishness.” This is frustrating on so many levels and shows the far left’s true aversion to challenging some of the true academic and philosophical justifications for capitalism: they are afraid. Afraid because deep down they know that on some levels Rand is right – and we see it already. The true producers have already begun to “shrug.”  Hedge Fund managers (who send vital signals to markets) are relocating accounts abroad. Wall Street execs are getting out b/c they don’t want the public lynching.

Adhering, or even just liking or identifying, with Rand’s philosophy isn’t about being an asshole or a dick.  It’s really about attempting to reflect real value in society, less many of the normative assumptions about how things “should” or “ought” to be based simply on inequities. It is unadulterated elitism, which inherently is harsh, and comes as a direct offense to many of the aims of the far left wing of the Democratic party. To expand on the Wall Street vignette: House Democrats want to pass a bill to throw a .25 percent tax on all stocks, options, derivatives and futures trades in an attempt to reap an estimated $150B a year in tax revenue.  Purportedly, the revenue will only be into a “job creation reserve” and would function to pay for any expansions in government employment. The bill, entitled “Let Wall Street Pay for the Restoration of Main Street Act of 2009,” (No, you really can’t make this stuff up anymore…) bears eerie resemblance to some of the legislation found in Atlas. Why is this an affront to Rand’s philosophy? The Wall Street executive of today may be portrayed as an evil individual, but an executive at Goldman Sachs could be a hero of a contemporary Atlas Shrugged. The trades these firms make, the money they flow into and out of the credit markets, the investment financing they make…they bear the risk of growth time and time again because they are the ones who believe they are smart enough to tell the winners from the losers. The tax is simply a money grab…an attempt to stop those who can from making “too much” because of a fallacious assumption: any inequity is wrong. This goes back to why the left can or will never truly attempt to counter Rand’s philosophy: there are afraid of trying to explain why it makes sense to punish success, so they operate under the assumption that any inequity is wrong.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/69295-dems-push-wall-street-150b-stock-tax

Obama has been quoted saying that he is happy with people pursuing their dreams, but that he does not want every math wiz to run to Wall Street to become a derivatives trader. The fear of challenging success permeates throughout capitol hill…

The most frustrating portion of the justification of this bill is the idea that Wall Street “needs to be put to work for the public good,” and that this tax would help limit speculation and short-term high volume trading. Ironically, limiting speculation will lead to more volatile markets.  Speculators help keep prices in check by absorbing risk where others won’t…they buy at the low-end and sell at the high-end. Yes, middle class Americans won’t be paying much of this tax – they tend to buy stocks and hold them. But they will be most hurt by it. The Wall Street traders, with their high frequency trading algorithms, their math wiz MIT grads, their complicated growth strategies, their willingness to take a risk, their belief in making winners win…these are the people who drive the economy. And these people will stop what they are doing if that have to pay these sorts of taxes. The Middle Class…their pensions, tied up in mutual and index funds, will bear the brunt of this cost in growth. The retired, whose retirement funds likely include stocks, options, and other derivates…these people will feel this cost too.

My advice to anyone supporting this bill is this: keep going. Do everything you can to get this bill passed. Call your congressmen, send money, call your local unions, get in touch with your local college campus. Do everything imaginable to churn up as much support for this bill as possible. March on Washington and tell capitol hill how you feel about the young Wall Street traders easily making six figure sums for managing the capital allocation in this the world’s largest economy.  Because once this bill is passed, the time for arguing and fear will be over. You can point to Maiden Lane or Wall Street and say “give us our money back!” or “pay your fair share!” But few will be there to listen. The men of value will be gone; they’ve shrugged. They’ll come back of course… but only if you’ll let them.

Leave A Comment »

GAP

Posted in Style on November 24, 2009 by SweetEnlow

Without a doubt, the best clothing store in the country that defines the best bang for your buck idea is the GAP.  No other retailer rivals the GAP in its products quality, style, and price.  Every time I am in a GAP store, I am tempted to buy something.  Not because I necessarily need anything, but because the temptation of a tight product at such a low price is hard to find.  Particularly, the GAP has awesome T-shirts, V-neck sweaters, and their new denim is great – but there is a lot more.

GAP was struggling some years ago, but they brought this new creative director in from Ralph Lauren or somewhere (I can’t really remember), but either way, he has done a great job and GAP’s success has shown his ability. 

If you want to be thrifty on your clothing, yet still care how you look, concentrate on purchasing  much of your casual clothes from the Gap.  A majority of their product is great stuff.

Some Products I have recently purchased

the illest flan

I did not buy this tomato shirt, but other colors look great

Rilers attempted to call this a "Mr. Rogers" sweater, but she doesn't know what the hell she is talking about

 Due to personal preference, I can’t help you with Jeans, but most all GAP jeans are acceptable in my opinion.

Just stay away from some of the sweaters GAP has that makes you look like Waldo

2 Comments »

The Cyclical Nature of Men’s Fashion

Posted in Style on November 23, 2009 by SweetEnlow

Last night, I took my Brazilian to see Jude Law play Hamlet on Broadway.  It was an incredible show.  But, after the show, I began to think more and more about this article I had just hours before read in the latest GQ (where Jude Law was oddly enough featured) about the reversion of men’s fashion currently into turn-of-the-century type garb. 

I personally love this era.  Lots of thick garments, herringbone prints, and vests.  But some era’s should never be repeated… like the 70′s.

In any regard, I began to think about the cyclical nature of mens style and what it means.  I thought about the interesting aspects of different trends that come and go i.e. Skinny ties, Lacoste polos, Plaid etc…  But what I came to conclude is that, for 90% of men, a man should avoid the current trends extremes and always buy “timeless.”  The reason being is that most guys have no idea what they are doing when they are purchasing clothes. 

Being “timeless” in your wardrobe means taking an approach of simplicity and quality to your selection.  To give an example, take the Blazer.  A quality single-breasted Navy Blazer from the likes of Brooks Brothers or Ralph Lauren will forever be cool.  As long as it fits properly (spend some money on this… at least have it tailored) and has moderate lapels, a Navy Blazer can be the most versatile piece of clothing you own.  Casual or Dressy, it  goes with anything and can be worn anywhere… anytime.

A great blazer is but one of many examples one could list, but that is not the message of the post.  The point is, always approach your wardrobe with simplicity and quality in mind.  With that as your foundation, you can almost never go wrong.

Yes, this does rule out graphic tees

The aforementioned turn-of-the-century style is essentially very simple with the most extreme thing being likely the bow tie.  Dark Suits, dark ties, and white shirts were staples.  Jude Law’s next movie is Sherlock Holmes coming out on Xmas this year.  With Robert Downey as Holmes and Guy Ritchie the director, I am sure it will be great.  But, I can’t lie, I am interested to see what they are wearing

Looking dope - dark suit, dark trench, white shirt

1 Comment »

The High Price of Low Cost

Posted in Lifestyle, Movies on November 19, 2009 by SweetEnlow

I recently made a post explaining my hatred towards one of the largest corporations in the world, Wal-Mart.  Everything I stated in the post was entirely anecdotal and based on my own experience.  However, I mentioned that I knew there to be a documentary in circulation covering Wal-Mart’s antics and that it was very high on my Netflix queue.  I watched the film last night and I wanted to take this post and continue my desired scathing critique of Wal-Mart. 

To begin, I wanted to state that I have seen much better documentaries.  The people interviewed were unfortunate souls (for the most part) that definitely caused you to feel sorry for them, but their stories were really not that novel in their aspects.  This will be explained further later.  Additionally, the makers of the film used kitschy graphics with poor aesthetics diminishing the overall value of presentation.  Lastly, not one intellectual was interviewed in the film.  It would have been nice to hear what a respected economist had to say about Wal-Marts policies…  No matter, the movie definitely got its point across – Wal-Mart, family oriented as it claims to be, is simply like every other major company where profit is the bottom line.  I can’t say I blame them really, but I still despise them as a company and here is why

First, as well know, Wal-Mart destroys the intricacies of small-town America.  I would not be so opposed to its crowding out of these small business if, and this is a big if, Wal-Mart provided a better product, but they simply don’t.  The example the documentary showed explained how, before Wal-Mart ended their business, every person in each section of their business i.e. plumbing, electrical, mechanical, was an expert in their craft.  Wal-Mart moved in, hired slappies for 7 dollars and hour, and quality diminished.  The lack of knowledge the Wal-Mart employees held was unfortunate.  I despise quantity over quality

Second, Wal-Mart has seemingly very poor health care options.  I realize that this is a bias and a very narrow opinion based solely on the documentary, but some of the things Wal-Mart promoted was pretty absurd.  The regional managers of Wal-Mart were actually promoting their employees to seek state medical assistance so that Wal-Mart did not have to cover their costs.  Because of this, many of the poor employees simply could not afford health care.  My issue is that Wal-Mart makes so much money, they can spare some profit to assist these pitiful people.  In the end, it would likely be better for them as a company. 

Next, and this was my favorite part, Wal-Mart literally has a Orwellian “Big Brother” type atmosphere created to stop any potential chance of a union forming!  The policies they have are comical.  They have 24/7 anti-union hotlines, a permanent spy van, and 24/7 spy cameras combating against chance of a union forming.  I am not a proponent of unions, but the intellectual level of most of these employee’s does not pose a substantial threat to Wal-Mart in any way.

Being a libertarian, I got pretty hott when they stated that the government grants Wal-Mart 1 billion annually to expand its stores.  I am assuming this has a lot to with lobbying in congress, but either way, it is absurd.  I hate handouts, even for poor, so it is pretty ridiculous that one of the most profitable companies in the world is even granted a dollar, let alone 1 billion.

Lastly, the movie, towards the end, discusses in-depth the amount of crime that takes place at Wal-Mart, 80% in the parking lot.  Terrible things have happened in these parking lots : murder, rape, robbery, stabbings etc… What is worse is that studies have shown that when Wal-Mart post one security guard in a roaming golf cart, crime dropped to zero…zero.  Wal-Mart knew this, but they wanted to save that money.  Again, pretty shady business practices from a supposed family oriented business.

I have repeated this many times, but Wal-Mart is a private enterprise and in many ways I respect them.  However, I just like to think that if I were placed in charge of Wal-Mart, especially if I had their enormous amount of cash reserves, that I would sacrifice a billion dollars a year (or whatever amount) in order to improve the quality of life both for my employees and consumers.  A billion may sound like a lot, but Wal-Mart can afford it. 

Wal-Mart: The High Price of Low Cost.  Check it out

6 Comments »

Tyson Documentary

Posted in Movies on November 18, 2009 by SweetEnlow

Approximately 6 months ago, the highly touted Mike Tyson Documentary was released.  Immediately I was giddy to see it.  It was written and directed by Tyson’s close friend James Toback.  If you dont know the story of Tyson, it is incredible.  I have always been fascinated with him, both as an athlete and as a person.  Athletically, I personally feel you could make an argument that, during his prime, he may have been the best athlete of the 20th century.  His neurological system i.e. hand speed, punching power, footwork was and still is unrivaled by any heavyweight before and after.  If you are a fan of fighting, you can really can understand how incredibly fast he really was.  Additionally, he was sooooo entertaining as one of the most aggressive fighters in history (yes, he would have likely lost to both Ali and Foreman, but style makes fights, especially in boxing).  There was a reason he was nicknamed “Kid Dynamite.” 

As a person, Tyson may be even more interesting.  A young kid in Brooklyn with absolutely no direction, he gets thrown in juvenile and starts boxing.  The rest is history as far as that is concerned.  What is extremely interesting is that Tyson found the only true love in his life through his choice the violent sport of boxing.  His first trainer Cus D’Amato was likely the only person who ever truly cared for Tyson and it was D’Amato who should be credited for Tyson’s success.  D’Amato died unfortunately when Tyson was 19 or 20, but he was able to retain many of his life lessons… that is until he met that scumbag Don King.  Never have I seen or read about such a piece of shit in the history of sports.  I hate Don King for what he did Tyson. 

Some of the things Tyson experienced were so incredible it is hard for me to fathom.  For example, when Tyson was in his early 20′s, the entire state of Russia was giving him parades in the Red Square.  Hundreds of thousands of people attended to see the Champ.  He was worth hundreds of millions of dollars.  He was so rich that he was literally spending a million dollars a year on Tiger food.  And, most importantly, he was the holder of the most cherished athletic title in the world, the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world.  A once heard that respect is the ultimate currency and no one had more respect, deserved or undeserved, than Tyson. 

Tyson is one of the most interesting people of the last 30 or 40 years and this documentary does a great job at capturing both the highs and lows of Tyson’s life.  I only hope that one day I might be able to sit down and have an adult conversation with Mike and pick his brain, questioning him on his life experiences and choices.  Undoubtedly, my most beloved athlete of all time.

I hope you can take some time and watch this great film and contemplate his life.  It really is an incredible story.

Leave A Comment »

Mixed Gender Offspring

Posted in Lifestyle on November 16, 2009 by SweetEnlow

The topic of having a mixed gender family and its benefits is something that I have been thinking about for sometime.  Everything in this post is purely anecdotal and, to my knowledge, has no scientific backing.  It is all purely observation.  However, my hope is that after reading this, you to will begin to see what I see and understand my thought process.

Starting, I guess, with high school I began to spend time often with females.  I had a girlfriend for the most of high school so, most of the time, I was spending time with these females for non-sexual reasons.  Thus, the fact that these girls needed to be cool became even more pressing.  Many things make a girl cool undoubtedly, but, after numerous, and sometimes painful, years of doing this, I began to notice a commonality among all the females I enjoy.  They all come from mixed gender families….ALL OF THEM.

Before I explain, I want to clarify two things.  First, this isn’t a definite rule but purely an observation.  I am sure there are awesome girls out there that are an only child or of a family of all girls.  In fact, my mom, which I know was awesome to be around (and still is), is from an all girl’s family.  Second, this logic applies just as much to men.  Guys that dont have sisters tend to be a little more awkward around girls.  Again, not a definite, but I would presume that this is the case a large percentage of the time.

Picture 010

Though she is a contradiction to my proposed observation, she is the greatest ever... Nancy

Here is the premise.  When someone grows up around members of the opposite sex, especially when they are close in age, they develope knowledge about the opposite sex that becomes vital for social compatability later in life.  When concerning women, they have an automatic better understanding of male humor, thus making them much more enjoyable to be around in social settings and much more engaging in a conversation.  After years of bathroom humor, talking sports, and discussing relationships from a guys point of view, osmosis undoubtedly occurs.  They just seem to understand better.  Same thing for guys.  After years of discussing dress malfunctions, relationship gossip, and whats important in kissing well, a guy (at least an intelligent one) will get the point.

Take a second and think about the opposite sex. 

Think about when you are just wanting to hang. 

The people who initially come to mind will undoubtedly be the ones you enjoy spending time with.  Now, think and see if they are from a mixed gender family.  I bet 9 out of 10 are.  It’s not failsafe, but I think I am getting at something.

Lastly, this is for guys – if you believe what I believe, dont be that idiot who says “Ohh… I only want boys because I dont want to worry about other guys taking out my daughter” etc etc… that is juvenile… I want lots of daughters… and sons

2 Comments »

WoW!

Posted in Sports on November 12, 2009 by SweetEnlow

Some of you have likely already seen this for I do not get a chance, nor do I really desire, to watch a lot of Sportscenter.  However, I accidentally stumbled upon this link and was, well, I do not know really what to think.

It’s the video coverage of the New Mexico female soccer player who is likely the dirtiest player I have ever seen.  My question is “did this girl have no idea she was on camera?”  The things she was doing were so blatant it was like it was scripted.  She is such an idiot.  If you have not seen it… check out this link

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=4629837

Incredible … I am not really going to act ridiculous and proclaim she was unsportsmanlike.  I think she is just trashy.

4 Comments »

« Older Entries
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.