Archive for January, 2010

Apple Thoughts…

Posted in Lifestyle on January 31, 2010 by SweetEnlow

Last Wednesday, Steve Jobs unveiled his latest creation, the iPad.  Like all Apple products, the buzz surrounding this thing was incredible.  On my Google news feed, it held as many headlines as Haiti and the State of the Union.

I dont know what to think about the iPad.  Its supposed to be a mix between a computer and a smart phone, but I always keep thinking, “what is the point of that?”  It has an e-Reader which looks great, but I wouldnt use it.  Its ability to read the news I think is likely the strongest point in my opinion.  I guess they have incredible apps for it.  It plays movies etc… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM8iau3whFI&feature=player_embedded# 

I am personally a big fan of Apple products – cleaner, simpler, better looking.  But the iPad release caused me to contemplate the US’s cultural approach to Macs. 

I keep thinking about how the Mac laptop is so popular among females in college.  I remember when my high school girlfriend got her MacBook Pro, she would contemplate opting to “stay in” for the evening just so she could mess around with the picture-manipulator-thing.  This was the beginning of my noticing…  It has gotten so bad now that I find myself almost judging a girl for not having one, thinking “whats her deal???”  Ridiculous I know.  The Mac laptop is now one of the necessary purchases for a young female entering her college years, along with a couple hundred dollars worth of gear from “The Container Store.”  How about the music scene?  If you are a DJ, you must to have a Mac.  Even though PCs can do the exact same thing, a Mac is a prerequisite to being good (Oddly enough, I have seen GirlTalk actually use a Panasonic WorkBook).  The same goes for editing music, film, and graphic design.

What I personally noticed is that Apple has seemed to have penetrated the “Hollywood scene” making it the centerpiece of all Celebs.  Because of the celebrity obsession here in the States, pop culture has created this aura around Apple products as if its a sign that you are hip to the times – if you don’t have on your kind of boring right??  Think about everyone’s favorite TV shows.  Ari Gold’s office computer is a Mac.  Carrie Bradshaw writes her column on a Mac laptop.  Jobs is an innovating genius, but arguably the most brilliant thing he has done, in my opinion, is penetrate the inner circles of the entertainment industry for the display of his products.

I hate to say it, but I think a large reason I like Macs is because of this reason – that and they are simply better looking

State of the Union and Paleo

Posted in Health on January 28, 2010 by SweetEnlow

Last night, President Obama issued what was supposed to be his most important speech of his young presidency.

I was highly interested – as I think most should.  Many things Obama stated sounded fishy, especially after I spoke to my Ph.D-from-MIT professor.  But what is not fishy is the rising deficient our country is currently experiencing – about a trillion a year.  As costly as the two wars are to the government, what is striking is that these wars cost little compared to our government’s welfare programs, social security, medicare, and Medicaid.

Social Security is so complicated that I can not even begin to address the issues surrounding it.  However, what is relatively easy to fix is the American citizen’s continuing dependance on government support for their medical issues – namely, prescription drugs.

I guess one might call me a “moderate libertarian” in that I tend to have more compassion than other libertarians.  But, on the aggregate, little to no government involvement is almost always my dream.  I do not have a serious problem with the government taking care of someone who suffers a catastrophic injury, but providing billions, literally, for prescriptions to treat obesity, self-inflicted diabetes, and heart conditions is not ok – its simply unfair.  In no way is it right for taxpayers to pay for someone else’s poor choices…

Regardless of my philosophical opinion…

The solution to the health care crisis is so simple – diet.  To be more precise, its the paleolithic diet.

In my opinion, it literally requires an intelligent person , which all of our government officials are supposed to be, 30 minutes of reading to understand why eating the way we have evolved changes the whole dynamic of American health.

When you eat a paleolithic diet, you do not get sick.  Coughs, colds, allergies cease to exist.  Obesity doesn’t exist.  Diabetes the same…  Dont believe me, ok.  Research some fellow paleo-eaters and hear their testimonies. 

I just finished this book entitled “The Biology of Belief” and its basic premise is that our genes are, in fact, not controlled by our genetics but controlled by their enviroment – namely proper diet, excercise, and lifestyle.  These 3 components force proper human gene expression. 

Colds, Diabetes, Obesity, OK.  What about cancer?  The causes of cancer have baffled scientists for years.  Well, the author of “Biology of Belief” makes a powerful statement concerning cancer, particularly breast cancer, widely considered a genetic curse, when he writes “that 95% of breast cancers are not due to inherited genes.  The malignancies in a significant number of cancer patients are derived from environmentally induced epigenetic alterations and not defective genes.” “In fact, only 5% of cancer and cardiovascular patients can attribute their disease to heredity.” (Lipton 42)

shocking… but not really

Personally, I started living Paleolithically (as best I can) around one year ago.  It is definitely a change, and it is not necessarily easy in the beginning.  But its not easy because we have developed such a poor enviroment/diet for our bodies over the course of our lives that it takes some time to get back living how we were designed.  (Of course, the worst being the heavy reliance upon grains…. again for another post entirely.)  For example, when I eat grains, I feel sick the next day.  I am almost always congested, sore throat with mucus build-up, and overall very fatigued.  Sounds ridiculous I know, but the same happens to all my other paleo-eaters.  Ask them…

If the American government were to “nudge” our community into the right direction, the benefits would be astronomical, both economically and socially.  Michelle Obama wouldn’t even have to chair a committee concerning Obese children.

Prince v Michael

Posted in Musik on January 26, 2010 by SweetEnlow

A little over 6 months ago, the King of Pop, otherwise known as Michael Jackson died… at 50.  The story of Jackson is simply sad – no I did not find all of his weird behavior intriguing, but I am definitely the minority.

Jackson was, in my opinion, the greatest entertainer in American history (maybe Elvis), but what Jackson wasn’t was a great musician.  From what I understand he played little or no instruments.

Now, Prince on the other hand is one the greatest musicians of all time.  He plays tons of different instruments, writes his own songs, and produces his own albums.  I once heard that he his so much faith in his own ability that he plays each instrument for each of his songs, then goes back and mixes them to make sure it is down right.  Highly Impressive.

In addition, Prince has been putting out jams since he was 18 in 1976.  He is still putting out albums with his latest having likely my favorite prince song “Call my Name.”  Check it

Either way, as a musician, Prince trumps just about everybody… including Michael Jackson

baller

The Prussian Observation

Posted in Lifestyle, Military on January 24, 2010 by SweetEnlow

Recently, the Institution won the prestigious award of being selected the number one school in the United States.  To be a part of that is both humbling and exciting, particularly since I am graduating this year under that mantra. 

Members of the Institution I feel are definitely elite – the sacrifices made and constant tests we are forced to go through definitely causes an unrivaled maturity to arise.  In addition, the education is great … I could on go on and on about the benefitsof this place…

However, the institution’s  members have one serious, serious problem – social skills.  It is no secret that members of my school lack some certain required social abilities – mainly just not being awkward – but none more so than the Institutions aggregate lack of ability to dress.

A close friend of mine, Prussia, who takes a wide interests in many topics outside the military and who, like me, is very observant dressed up as a member of the Institution this past Halloween and literally nailed the lack of ability to dress right on the head.  Here is a picture of the Prussian in full attire:

To some less-observant type people, this garb may look rather normal, but let me break it down so as to explain what we are dealing with here…

First, Prussia is spot-on with the jeans/running shoe combination.  As you can see, these are not AirMax’s, but rather the same shoe worn for his latest diagnostic APFT – I believe these may be Sauconys??  Of course, white running shoes can only be accompanied by white ankle socks.

Prussia jeans are fine in my opinion.  However, he reverts back to the classic look of the Institution with the tightly tucked, off-brand polo shirt with the white T-shirt underneath.  Now, I personally do not have a real problem with this, but it does look classic cadet-like. 

Next, he is sporting the obligatory dark brown (camo, real tree, or khaki are just as applicable) baseball cap worn as far down on his face as he possibly can.  Since he is a member of the Institution, the only legitimate place he can actually traverse in Manhattan is Times Square (as shown by the sign) accompanied by the usually guaranteed stern-face – that is unless one has just dropped 50 bucks on draft Yuengling at the closest TGI Fridays

Lastly, there are two details one may not initially notice, but are essential for understanding the entire wardrobe.  First, under Prussia’s right arm lies the classic Artic company winter thermal jacket – odds are it a NorthFace, but they could be an outkast and be wearing the once popular brands of Patagonia or Columbia.  Secondly, though it is covered up, he is sporting the always important digital watch circa 1993.  It may or may not have a mini calculator on it, but you can be damn sure it has logged some serious time on the 2-mile course

Now, I love my school and I am very proud to be a member, but sometimes they way we present ourselves to people that have nothing to do with the military can make us look less than the best.  Prussia spent a month with the British Military Academy last summer and he explained that they spend one whole week at Sandhurst just on how to wear a suit.  Impressive… at least for someone like me. 

America

the E-reader

Posted in Books, Lifestyle on January 22, 2010 by SweetEnlow

Recently, there has been a tremendous surge in the “e-Reader” technology of Amazon’s “Kindle” and Barnes & Nobles’ “Nook.”

Most know the general idea – one can purchase just about any modern book (and I think magazine and blog) and store it on their e-Reader; this material along with tons of other “stuff.”  This saves physical space, the need to lug around a heavy book/magazines, and money.  In fact, a friend was explaining to me that since you are only paying for information, the books are all substantially cheaper.  Interesting…

In classic market competition, Barnes and Nobles released their Nook.  I am unfamiliar with the details of the contractual agreement one has to take on with B & N, but im assuming one can’t buy amazon products and slap it in their kindle.  I do know that if you own a Nook you can enter any B & N and read any book in the store.  Very interesting…

These gadgets are but one of many examples of technology out-dating classic-type media- physical newspapers ceasing to exist is just one example.  However, I will likely never purchase a Kindle or Nook or any e-Reader and if you enjoy reading as much as I do, I hope my argument sways you somewhat in my direction, but I do realize its all preference.

When I read a a book,  it captures my mind and it creates an attachment to words on the pages.  I write in the margins and highlight.  I dog-ear pages with powerful paragraphs.  I enjoy the pain it requires to carry the object around.  I enjoy the way books smell, particularly old ones, as odd as that sounds.  A lot books are symbols and/or reference for my life.

All of these things I enjoy about reading are diminished or completely removed when you use an e-Reader.  How do you write thoughts in the digital margin or dog-ear a particular page?  Can you call up a book on an e-Reader 5 years later and recall the events going in your life at that time?  Maybe, but odds are you will have deleted it from you hard drive.

Additionally, I enjoy collecting the books I have read.  Not only do I feel satisfaction from knowing I attained (at least some) knowledge, but it looks it good.  Unfortunately, ones DVD collection doesn’t look as good as one’s book collection – sorry.

The e-Reader technology is great is all its facets, but its not for me.

I may be weird about my books, but I think all can agree there is “something” to the tangible-ness of a classic book.

ps – if I am wrong about some of the technological capabilities, which I’m sure I am in some ways – my apologies.  However, regardless of the abilities, it won’t negate most of my statement(s)

Some new ones…

Posted in Musik on January 20, 2010 by SweetEnlow

The band Phoenix just released a new album entitled “Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix” and it is great.  Many might not know the band because they are somewhat cult-ish; however, I highly recommend checking them out and their new album.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyU24rr0doo

this is likely my favorite from one of their older albums.  I first heard it in the movie “Shallow Hal” – which is, by the way, a great movie

In addition, Justin Bieber just released a new song entitled “Baby” and it is awesome.  Not really a shocker here considering it was number 2 on iTunes last I checked.  Either way, this kid is interesting – discovered on youtube, offered by both Timberlake and Usher, and is now killing it with young Michael Jackson-esque* lyrics.

Lastly, I wanted to post this video because I honestly think it is one of the best live performances of pop music in a while.  A combination of Timberlake, Timbaland, Kerri Hillson, and Nelly Furtado (who looks incredible by the way) makes for some goosebumping entertainment at the 2007 VMAs… check it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-u-_NYSJjo

Pit Bull

Posted in Lifestyle on January 18, 2010 by SweetEnlow

My sister just recently adopted an American Pit Bull from the pound last week and it gave me inspiration to write this post.

Let me say upfront, Pit Bulls are, by far and away, my favorite type of dog.  A combination of ”Bully breeds” with terriers, Pit Bulls possess just about everything I like in animals (humans too!) – athleticism, beautiful hair, muscular structure, and toughness.

Pit Bulls have such a bad reputation that I wanted to take some time and attempt to debunk all on the nonsense surrounding these animals.  Yes, Pit Bulls receive their name from fighting in Pits – whether against a Bull (literally) or other dogs.  However, what most don’t realize is that during the evolution of the sport, the dog’s handlers would not breed any of the dogs that were aggressive towards humans.  What that means is that when these dogs were fighting each other to the death, literally, a handler was supposed to be able to step in between the two dogs and stop the fight to immediately.  If the dog didn’t stop and showed aggression/bit the handler, they wouldn’t breed that dog.  Because of this, Pit Bulls are not inherently aggressive towards humans.

Now, obviously there has been Pit Bull attacks on humans.  However, I would argue that this is almost entirely due to neglect and mistreatment by the owners than just the idea that Pit Bulls are inherently aggressive towards people.  Not feeding an animal, chaining them up, and displaying overall neglect will cause any animal to be hostile towards humans. 

The biggest problem with Pits is not their aggression – many types of dogs attempt to attack humans annually – but rather the damage they can do to a human.  They can easily kill a kid and often times severely injure, if not kill, an averaged size woman (they of course are not exactly easy for a man to handle either).

A buddy of mine was telling me that in England, they call Staffordshire Bull Dogs (the original Pit Bull) “Nanny Dogs” because the owners can leave their children with them, go on an errand, and come back to their children entirely safe.  Most dogs could not do this.

I love dogs, especially big ones, but Pits are the best.  Don’t hate own them because of poor owners and terrible environments.  They are incredible dogs and are likely the only type I will ever own.

 

Athleticism – does it matter?

Posted in Sports on January 15, 2010 by SweetEnlow
My close friend and I, Baby, are in constant argumentative dialogue concerning the importance of raw athleticism in order to achieve high amounts of success in sports.

The argument usually arises from a discussion concerning my passion, MMA, whereby Baby states that superior physicality in the sport far outweighs the importance of technique involved within the sport.  Logically, consider it is an ongoing argument, I make the opposite claim that, especially for MMA, technique is just as important as physical talent – around 50/50.  

Discussing athleticism in MMA is for another post entirely and it would be highly unreadable for most readers.  However, I wanted to continue my inital claim by discussing players in other sports.  

"I wish this version had fighting so I could bitchslap Wayne..."

 

   

  

Now, in no way can I or woud I ever disregard Baby’s argument concerning the importance of athleticism and the necessity one must undertake in order to achieve their highest capability.  Clearly, Lebron is the best player (agruably… I dig Kobe) and the best athlete in the NBA.  Jose Reyes – the best athlete in the MLB and it definitely a top 10 player.  Dion Sanders was a freak – greatest corner ever – maybe the greatest Defensive player ever.  The list is ad infinitum  for great players being ridiculous athletes.  HOWEVER…  

I wanted to present some of the greatest players ever who for professional athletes are considered marginal in talent… at best.  First, the greatest example – Wayne Gretzky.  He was considered the smallest, weakest, and least athletic on his team, yet he is the greatest hockey player of all time.  How about Steve Nash?  A short white guy winning the MVP in the NBA (twice right?)- and deservedly so…  Nash is no Iverson in talent… 

What about Football?  Personally, I do not think my argument holds up as well in football where, usually, raw talent, equals a lot of success.  However, the best quarterback  of all time was Joe Montana who didn’t necessarily possess the “Peyton Manning arm.”  Another great example, Adrian Wilson, the safety for the Cardinals, is legendary for his vert – its all over youtube.  Yet, I would take John Lynch running a 4.7 every single time over that absurd vert.  

I guess what I what to point out is that, especially in team sports, certain intangibles matter almost as much as ability.  The ability to be a playmaker, be cool under pressure, think quickly, be intelligent about the sport - these are all qualities of excellent professional athletes, not necessarily qaulities of excellent athletes in professional sports.   

I think the NFL combine and the amount of value weighed upon the results are mind-boggling.  To somehow think that a .1 faster 40 is going to equivocate to even a .1 better player is ridiculous.   

Concerning fighting, one of the most important characteristics is without a doubt gameness.  Without it, one should really reconsder his choices – in wrestling, boxing, MMA etc…  

Being a great athlete is highly important, but being a great athlete is not the sole determinant of success in professional sports… people should consider that…  

I personally prefer the playmaker just making it happen as opposed to the freak athlete, but that is likely because I don’t have their ability…  

Jay Leno Show and Mark Mcgwire

Posted in Lifestyle, Sports on January 13, 2010 by SweetEnlow

Two things have had me bugging lately…

First, the issue surrounding the Jay Leno Show.  I love Jay Leno.  I always watched him over Letterman growing (though I enjoy Letterman as well).  It was sad to see him go from his primetime spot.  As most know, he didn’t actually want to go and decided to create his show during prime time.  This was NBCs first attempt to appease both Conan and Leno.

If you don’t know, it didn’t work out.  After the Olympics are complete, they are moving his show back to his original prime time spot, and bumping Conan, the new host of the Tonight Show, out of his normal spot. 

This bothers me because Conan will eventually leave and go to Fox.  When this happens, there will probably be tensions that could have been avoided in the first place had NBC handled it properly, both with Leno and Conan.  The network is putting clout over a symbol of American Entertainment which I find unfortunate.

The second issue deals with Mark McGwire.  I’m sure my comments on this blog are but one of a trillion on all the sports blogs out there but nonetheless…

My issue with McGwire has almost entirely to do with his approach to owning up to his actions.  Look, if your options, as a professional athlete, were to be a good player, make a couple million, and have a comfortable career, OR you could become an incredible player, the most famous athlete in America for sometime, boost your salary by many millions, and guarantee your self a hall of fame spot, just about EVERYONE WOULD JUICE

McGwire should swallow his pride and admit that what he did was not something wrong or immoral, but something he thought was best for his career at the time.  Though he came relatively clean yesterday, he still would not admit every detail, particularly the ones with Canseco, and its simply annoying.  I hate to break the news to him, but him coming out saying he used steroids isn’t exactly  a shocker among the sports world.

Lastly, (and this really bothers me) is there really a need to have congressional oversight into baseball – literally, a kid’s game?  Yes, over usage of steroids can be dangerous; however, probably no more dangerous (on the aggregate) than one can endure through overusing the mega-drug of  [insert any number of common drugs used here].  Canceso talks about in his tell-all book that his physical condition is actually remarkable – he used steroids admittedly for 20 years. 

I do not agree with the idea that using steroids is immoral, or even cheating for that matter.  These guys were simply trying to get an edge in their profession… the same thing everybody does, or at least tries to do.  You can not fault someone for trying to improve their own quality of life, especially when it physically isn’t hurting anybody else. 

But honestly, this was in 2005.  We had a massive investigation into baseball by our legislative body during a two-sided war and the beginnings of one of the worst financial crisis’ in our countries history.  Think about it…

Pictures

Posted in Lifestyle on January 10, 2010 by SweetEnlow

I have been thinking lately about the importance of pictures for the representation of one’s aesthetic self… of course due to the rise of Facebook and the lack of social options here at the Institution

Everyone and their mom(s) (literally) check out other people on social media these dayz…  However, one should realize that, for most, pictures are not a very good indicator of one’s actual attractiveness… at least for the face.

Most people are not photogenic (my entire family is awful).  Lighting, timing, and qaulity of camera are all but a few of the variables that go into snapping a great photo.  I would be willing to bet that the people that actual do take great pictures are the ones who actually work on being photographed well… whether consciously (deleting a picture and taking it again) or subconsciously (taking an absurd amount of the same picture).

I think about this because 1. I am not photogenic and I wanted to be viewed objectively and 2. The people that I consider highly attractive usually have pictures that do not justify their scale of actual attractiveness.  Many times I’ve shown a picture thinking that this person is great-looking only to get a mediocre response.  I know they would have felt differently had they seen them in person.

Total stream-of-consciousness post I know, but just think about it the next time you scope facebook…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.