My close friend and I, Baby, are in constant argumentative dialogue concerning the importance of raw athleticism in order to achieve high amounts of success in sports.
The argument usually arises from a discussion concerning my passion, MMA, whereby Baby states that superior physicality in the sport far outweighs the importance of technique involved within the sport. Logically, consider it is an ongoing argument, I make the opposite claim that, especially for MMA, technique is just as important as physical talent – around 50/50.
Discussing athleticism in MMA is for another post entirely and it would be highly unreadable for most readers. However, I wanted to continue my inital claim by discussing players in other sports.

"I wish this version had fighting so I could bitchslap Wayne..."
Now, in no way can I or woud I ever disregard Baby’s argument concerning the importance of athleticism and the necessity one must undertake in order to achieve their highest capability. Clearly, Lebron is the best player (agruably… I dig Kobe) and the best athlete in the NBA. Jose Reyes – the best athlete in the MLB and it definitely a top 10 player. Dion Sanders was a freak – greatest corner ever – maybe the greatest Defensive player ever. The list is ad infinitum for great players being ridiculous athletes. HOWEVER…
I wanted to present some of the greatest players ever who for professional athletes are considered marginal in talent… at best. First, the greatest example – Wayne Gretzky. He was considered the smallest, weakest, and least athletic on his team, yet he is the greatest hockey player of all time. How about Steve Nash? A short white guy winning the MVP in the NBA (twice right?)- and deservedly so… Nash is no Iverson in talent…
What about Football? Personally, I do not think my argument holds up as well in football where, usually, raw talent, equals a lot of success. However, the best quarterback of all time was Joe Montana who didn’t necessarily possess the “Peyton Manning arm.” Another great example, Adrian Wilson, the safety for the Cardinals, is legendary for his vert – its all over youtube. Yet, I would take John Lynch running a 4.7 every single time over that absurd vert.
I guess what I what to point out is that, especially in team sports, certain intangibles matter almost as much as ability. The ability to be a playmaker, be cool under pressure, think quickly, be intelligent about the sport - these are all qualities of excellent professional athletes, not necessarily qaulities of excellent athletes in professional sports.
I think the NFL combine and the amount of value weighed upon the results are mind-boggling. To somehow think that a .1 faster 40 is going to equivocate to even a .1 better player is ridiculous.
Concerning fighting, one of the most important characteristics is without a doubt gameness. Without it, one should really reconsder his choices – in wrestling, boxing, MMA etc…
Being a great athlete is highly important, but being a great athlete is not the sole determinant of success in professional sports… people should consider that…
I personally prefer the playmaker just making it happen as opposed to the freak athlete, but that is likely because I don’t have their ability…
